June 27, 2024
Contributors: Jeffrey Annessa, Senior Manager, Government Contractor Industry Group | Artan Ivezaj, Manager, Government Contractor Industry Group
Government contractors who serve the Department of Defense (DoD) under Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) covered contracts that contain the DFARS clause 252-242-7005 need to evaluate and maintain key Contractor Business Systems for compliance and adequacy per the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) clauses listed below. Per these rules, the DoD will conduct audits or reviews of the adequacy of these systems. If significant system deficiencies are identified and not corrected, the DoD can impose substantial consequences, such as withholding a percentage of payment or deeming a contractor ineligible to submit bids.
There are six contractor business systems:
The first three of the six contractor systems are audited by the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA). The remaining three are reviewed (not audited) by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA). Per 252.242.7005(d)(2), it is the sole purview of the contracting officer (CO) to determine system adequacy. This means the CO will make determinations regarding system approval or disapproval and the level of deficiencies if deficiencies are identified in a DCAA audit or a DCMA review.
In Part 1 of our series on Contractor Business Systems, we explore the requirements for a government-approved adequate accounting system as outlined in DFARS 252.242-7006 and required by Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 16.301-3 in the award of a cost-reimbursable type contract.
In accordance with the FAR, in order to be deemed responsible, contractors must have an accounting system that is adequate for the contract type contemplated. Thus, the FAR does not contemplate that all contractors must have an accounting system with the same attributes. Despite this, DFARS 252.242-7006 Accounting System Administration, lists 18 attributes a contractor’s accounting system must have in order for the system to be deemed acceptable. DCAA has paraphrased these 18 attributes so that an adequate accounting system should include:
The CO will contact DCAA to determine whether the potential contractor has performed government work recently or if there has been a gap in performing on government contracts. If either condition applies, DCAA will be notified that the CO would like an accounting system audit to be performed within a certain time period, which is typically a two-week period.
There are two types of accounting system audits:
Pre-Award Accounting System audits are requested to be performed when a new contractor is being considered or if there has been a prolonged period since the last contract with the Federal government. The pre-award accounting system audit is used to determine whether the contractor’s accounting system can comply with the Standard Form (SF) 1408 or Pre-Award Survey of Prospective Contractor (Accounting System) criteria:
It should be noted that the 1408 has three options for the auditor to use in reporting on the system’s adequacy for each criterion. They are “yes,” “no” and “na” (not applicable). Although a criterion may not be applicable for the contract type contemplated, DCAA generally will evaluate and report on that criterion anyway.
Post-Award Accounting System audits can occur once performance has begun on a contract. Additionally, they can occur on a cyclical basis or if there have been issues or potential deficiencies identified in other audits that are related to the accounting system. The intent of the post-award accounting system audit is to test for compliance with DFARS Accounting System criteria and contract requirements, as well as to determine that the accounting system and cost data produced by the system are reliable.
Pre-award and post-award audits both base their audit testing programs on the DFARS Accounting System criteria. One builds upon the other, and the post-award audit is more in-depth.
For the pre-award audit, the government is looking to determine whether the accounting system is capable of handling a flexibly priced contract and if a contractor can sufficiently demonstrate that the system is designed to comply with the DFARS criteria, although not all those criteria may be applicable to the contract in question. The SF 1408 and DCAA Pre-Award Accounting System Adequacy Checklist, which is available on the DCAA website, should be used by contractors new to government contracting to document how their accounting system is designed to meet the SF 1408 criteria. When conducting these types of audits, the government will typically ask a contractor to demonstrate how their system is designed or working effectively. This routinely involves several walkthroughs to gain a detailed understanding of the policies and procedures related to each DFARS criteria, as well as various system demonstrations to validate the system is working as described.
For a post-award audit, the government is looking to determine whether the accounting system currently complies with all DFARS criteria and whether the data provided by the accounting system is reliable for management purposes. The post-award audits will typically require more in-depth walkthroughs and system demonstration of the functional areas that relate to the DFARS criteria. The auditors will perform detailed testing that will typically cover several areas, including billing, timekeeping and labor charging, GL accumulation and reconciliation, unallowable costs, direct versus indirect costs, accumulation of indirect costs, etc.
There has been a trend in Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) and Governmentwide Acquisition Contracts (GWAC) requests for proposals (RFPs) scoring for DCAA-approved accounting system requirements, although DCAA does not approve such systems and there is no mention of such an approval in the FAR. In some instances, an accounting system review can be done by a third party versus an audit conducted by the government. Going through a third-party review can be used as a best practice to identify where you might need to tune up your policies and can also be leveraged as part of financial statement audits or reviews.
The Accounting Systems requirements for government contractors aren’t going anywhere and, at times, can even start to flow down into non-flexibly priced contract vehicles. As your company scales, you become CAS-covered or win large, fixed-price, or sole-sourced contracts that require you to submit certified cost and pricing data, the accounting system requirements start to trickle in. As your company continues to grow, you should keep the accounting system requirements on your radar and consider lining up your current cost accounting practices with the DFARS requirements. Staying informed about updates to DFARS and consulting with qualified professionals are essential for government contractors in today’s ever-evolving regulatory landscape.
Cherry Bekaert’s team of seasoned and experienced government contracting consultants are well versed in Contractor Business Systems requirements and complex control environments. We guide contractors in developing and maintaining compliant DFARS business systems, performing systems assessments, providing audit support, and preparing contractors for audits or reviews by DCAA, DCMA, or other cognizant agencies. If you have any questions specific to your situation, we are available to discuss them with you.